Development | Trade Policy Programme

Dr. Zainab Monisola Olaitan

Indigenous Knowledge-based entrepreneurship and the informal economy in Africa: Rethinking the grammar of economic policy

Indigenous Knowledge-based entrepreneurship and the informal economy in Africa: Rethinking the grammar of economic policy Zainab Monisola Olaitan, PhD The grammar of communicating economic policy in Africa matters both for content, design and impact. Since colonial times, the grammar of economic policy at the national level has been constructed around epistemic views from elsewhere. Yet, this grammar has either been misapplied or used to subjugate dominant economic orientation and practices on the continent. A critical part of this is the grammar of informality which has been used to describe the economic activities that employs more than two-third of Africans, especially women. By describing these economic activities as informal, the operators are left with little or no government support. Rather, they are harassed, persecuted and extorted by government officials, who are acting on the basis of coloniality of knowledge. The International Labour Conference (ILC) in 2002 provided a new framework for understanding the informal economy . They defined the informal economy as “all economic activities by workers and economic units that are – in law or in practice – not covered or insufficiently covered by formal arrangements”. The definition covers a broad spectrum of employment and economic activities that lack work-based safety nets, such as street vending, home-based employment, waste collection, domestic work, and temporary contract work etc. The dichotomisation of economies into formal and informal is geared towards the formalization and transition of informal economies to the mainstream economy. ILO notes that the informal economy signifies a crucial development challenge in Africa. Notably, majority of the African population are engaged in what the ILO termed the ‘informal economy’. It is estimated that 9 in ten Africans in rural and urban areas perform informal jobs, most of whom are women and young people who depend on the informal sector to survive and make a living. It is important to stress that the share of women involved in the informal economy is much more than men especially in Africa. In most African countries where gender-disaggregated data are available, women work in non-agricultural informal employment at a higher rate than men. Compared to men who make up 61% of non-agricultural employment in Africa, women make up 74% of the informal economy. Women constitute a large portion of the informal economy because they are the primary entrepreneurs in Africa. The World Bank Gender Innovation Lab note that women are more likely than men to be entrepreneurs, they make up 58% of the continent self-employed population. From time immemorial, trading has been a major economic activity that African women engage in. Despite the colonial intrusion that sought to undermine the role of women in the economy through the introduction of wage economy, they continue to play important roles in the economy. However, their contributions are not acknowledged as part of the formal economy making their entrepreneurial work less relevant due to the dichotomy. There are also misconceptions as to why women make up the informal economy, some state that the reason for the large number of women working in the informal economy is because they have no other options. They posit that women only work in this sector in order to survive and they would quit if they had the option to work in a respectable job. These misconceptions follow a western model of what work should be without considering how integral trade is to the African continent. The ILO dichotomies depict that if something is not easily modeled after Eurocentric models, it is left out of the equation in mainstream economics. The home-based worker, the work from home personnel, the woman trader mess up the model of productive labor established by mainstream economics, as they do not fi t within the established norms. Thus forcing us to acknowledge that dichotomies do not always work in certain contexts. The informalisation of African economies, and women’s participation in the trade perpetuates an ignorance of Indigenous knowledge-based businesses and women’s strides in entrepreneurship. Trading has been part of the African business ecosystem before the era of colonization in Africa, hence it is one of the economic activities Africans engaged in for economic development. Scholars and practitioners have sought ways to harness indigenous/local knowledge for entrepreneurship. Due to the fact that indigenous knowledge-based entrepreneurship challenge the externally imposed knowledge and policies developed by experts. It seeks ways to create collaborative, sustainable and valuable employment based on indigenous ways of knowing, thinking, and managing a community’s local environment. Indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) has many benefits for how businesses can be modeled in Africa especially bridging the gap between traditional knowledge and practices and contemporary challenges. Part of these challenges is mainstreaming the place of women entrepreneurs as frontliners in the socio-economic development of Africa. Notwithstanding the benefits that IKS has for entrepreneurship in Africa, current approach to entrepreneurship in Africa still take a western outlook where the structures and models of business are based on what the funders require, which in this case are mostly from the global north. Entrepreneurship is not novel to indigenous communities in Africa. However, in recent times, the idea that most businesses are built upon the wealth of knowledge and wisdom that indigenous communities possess, embracing their traditional practices, cultural heritage, and sustainable ways of living is increasingly gaining momentum. For instance the Africa Indigenous Knowledge Research Network https://africaindigenousresearch.com is focused on working with partners in Africa to study the ecosystem of the intersection between Indigenous knowledge and entrepreneurship in Africa. The Network is aimed at creating awareness that by leveraging indigenous knowledge systems into entrepreneurship, businesses will be able to create economic opportunities while preserving and revitalizing indigenous cultures. Businesses modeled on indigenous knowledge systems often recognize the value of indigenous knowledge systems that have been developed over generations and adapt them to address contemporary challenges. Indigenous knowledge-based businesses or ventures can empower their communities by providing them with a platform to showcase their skills, talent, knowledge, culture and values. Indigenous Knowledge Systems provide an enabling framework to stimulate and strengthen the

Indigenous Knowledge-based entrepreneurship and the informal economy in Africa: Rethinking the grammar of economic policy Read More »

Redefining-the-dynamics-of-power-and-economic-partnership-in-a-complex-global-order-book

New Book Release: Africa-EU Relations and the African Continental Free Trade Area

Redefining the dynamics of power and economic partnership in a complex global order Redefining the Dynamics of Power and Economic Partnership in a Complex Global Order Book | © 2024 Overview Editors: Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka, Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba Analyses the economic partnership between Africa and the EU via the African Continental Free Trade Area Examines the establishment and implementation of the AfCFTA Looks at how traditional dynamics of power continue to influence economic cooperation About this book This book examines the establishment and implementation of the AfCFTA, which is the largest free trade area globally, covering 54 African countries. It explores how this initiative has the potential to reshape Africa-EU relations by promoting intra-African trade, economic integration, and diversification, as well as inter- regional trade. Both continents have the potential to serve as global actors in reshaping the global order in ways that can affect how multilateralism fosters inclusive development. However, whether this will happen would be a function of how the EU and AU define their interests and relationship. Table of contents (14 chapters) Introduction: Redefining the Dynamics of Power and Economic Partnership in Africa–EU Relations Through the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba, Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka Pages 1-12 Euro-African Relations in a Changing Global Order: Shifting Balance Through the Russia–Ukraine War and the African Continental Free Trade Area? Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba Pages 13-26 Analysis of the AU–EU Relations Under the AfCFTA Framework in a Neoliberal Context John Mary Kanyamurwa, Ronald Kaddu, Robert Karemire Pages 27-51 Improving Intra-African Trade for AfCFTA and Non-AFCFTA Trade Flows Through Trade Policy Regime: Lessons from European Union Adebayo Sunday Adedokun Pages 53-77 Hackathons as a Support Tool for the AU-EU Partnership JAES: A Case Study Anna Masłoń-Oracz, Marta Odete F. Da Silva Coelho Pages 79-112 Africa–EU Digital Technology Exchange and Agribusiness Development in Developing Economies Within the African Continental Free Trade Area: The Case of Leribe and Thaba-Tseka Districts in Lesotho Nthabeleng Lekhanya Pages 113-127 Brexit and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): Some Lessons and Challenges from East Africa Ambrose T. Kessy Pages 129-151 The Practice of Soft Power in Africa-EU Relations: Is it Optimal or One-Sided? Mercy Atieno Odongo Pages 153-163 The European Union’s Soft Power in Africa: Model or Placebo? Oluwaseun Tella Pages 165-189 African–European Trade Cooperation and the Promise of African Continental Free Trade Area as Africa’s Soft Power Victor Fakoya, Bolaji Omitola Pages 191-221 Global Challenges, Regional Interventions: Exploring the Climate Change Adaptation Strategies of the African Union and the European Union Olanrewaju Emupenne, Michelle Small Pages 223-251 “No One Should Be Left Behind”: EU and Inclusion of Civil Society in the African Continental Free Trade Area Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka Pages 253-282 Towards Redefined Dynamics of Power and Economic Partnership in Africa-EU Relations in the Complex Global Order Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka, Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba Pages 283-292 Correction to: Africa-EU Relations and the African Continental Free Trade Area Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka, Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba Pages C1-C1 Editors and Affiliations Center Study of Governance Innovation, Univ of Pretoria, Fl 21, Humanities Bldg, Pretoria, South Africa Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka 439 Paterson Hall, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba About the editors Leon Mwamba Tshimpaka is Senior Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Centre for the Study of Governance Innovation (GovInn) and the SARChI Research Chair in the Political Economy of Migration in the SADC Region in the Department of Political Sciences of the University of Pretoria, South Africa. Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba is Assistant Professor at the Institute of African Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and Honorary Professor at the Thabo Mbeki African School of Public and International Affairs, University of South Africa, where he was previously an Associate Professor. Read More here

New Book Release: Africa-EU Relations and the African Continental Free Trade Area Read More »

Trade-Policy-Image

The African Continental Free Trade Area can transform the economy of Africa

The African Continental Free Trade Area can transform the economy of Africa The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is a major step towards an integrated, prosperous, and peaceful continent built on diversified, industrialised and developed economies. A key goal of the African Union’s Agenda 2063, the AfCFTA promotes intra-African trade and will create domestic markets for value-added products and services, writes Samuel Oloruntoba. Africa’s economy lacks diversity. The continent’s share of global merchandise exports has remained virtually unchanged, it stood at 1.9 per cent in 1998 and 2.5 per cent in 2018. The continent has experienced economic growth in the time, but this has been dependent on a boom in commodity prices and based on the exports of minerals. The African rising narrative between 2004 and 2014 was largely fuelled by Chinese demand for raw materials. This overdependence on the export of commodities and minerals to countries outside the continent has increased the vulnerability of African economies to external shocks such as Covid-19 or changes in demand in key markets. The taper these risks, Africa should pursue structural transformation of its economies. This involves diversification away from primary products dominating an economy towards offering more manufacturing, technology, and services. It also means the transition from producing raw materials to creating finished products, as well as from labour-intensive to skill-intensive economic activities. One of the major factors stifling the structural transformation of Africa is the limited capacity of states to formulate and implement appropriate policies. Despite many previous attempts, African development strategies have been ineffective in allocating resources to more productive sectors such as agribusiness, mineral beneficiation and financial services. Intra-Africa trade remains marginal at less than 17 per cent of the continent’s total trade. This compares unfavourably with other regions of the world such as the EU at 69 per cent, Asia at 47 per cent, and Latin America at 27 per cent. Small domestic markets and continental fragmentation limit the economies of scale for the production and distribution of goods and services.   Because of a lack of national institutional and administrative capacity the challenges of achieving structural transformation are best addressed at the continental level. The AfCFTA and structural transformation The AfCFTA is part of the regional integration agenda of the African Union which is focused on building an African Economic Community. Major African led-development strategies have placed a premium on regional integration as a means of increasing the flow of trade and investment and pursuing socio-economic transformation. The domestic capacity of many economies in Africa limits their ability to meaningfully negotiate with traditional and emerging trading partners. An integrated continental economy that enables African countries to negotiate as a bloc will greatly improve their leverage. A single African market would have over a billion people and a total Gross Domestic Product of over £2.36 trillion. This will enable economies of scale, drive competitiveness, and attract significant investments to the continent. When fully implemented, the AfCFTA will boost intra-African trade by 52.3 per cent, lift 30 million people out of poverty and boost continental income by £355 billion by 2035. The AfCFTA can foster the development of regional and international value chains, create opportunities for sharing the costs and benefits of the acquisition of needed technology and know-how by countries and firms, and nurture the adoption of internationally recognised standards and procedures. All of which will make African products more appealing on the global market. Progress so far Since its launch in January 2021, the AfCFTA’s scorecard shows some early wins. Through the guided trade initiative, eight countries have already started trading under the AfCFTA: Ghana, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Egypt, Mauritius, Cameroon, and Tunisia. The guided trade initiative facilitates trade in a limited number of areas including horticultural products, pharmaceuticals, rubber, aluminium kitchenware, sugar, steel, and wooden products. These products, which are produced and manufactured in Africa are traded duty-free and quota-free among the eight countries. Challenges to full implementation Africa has had its fair share of development strategies at the national, regional, and continental levels. Many of these have failed due to institutional and political challenges, including a lack of political will. It is very common for African leaders to place national interests above the agreed-upon shared goals and objectives of the continent. It may be rational for sovereign states to protect their national interests but taking such action without consideration for continental objectives has hinder their success. Specifically, there are concerns from small countries about the potential loss of import duties because of the removal of tariffs. Ongoing conflicts in different parts of the continent such as the war in Sudan, protests in Senegal and terrorism in the Sahel will also hinder the implementation of the AfCFTA. A lack of institutional capacity at the AU and a lack of clear communication and support channels between the AU’s Division of Economic Development, Trade, Mining and Tourism and the AfCFTA secretariat pose a serious challenge to the proper implementation and smooth operation of the trade zone. If successfully implemented, the AfCFTA can help reduce poverty and boost people’s living standards and state’s tax receipts through the structural transformation of the continent’s economies. But to achieve such lofty goals all stakeholders must be carried along for the ride.   Samuel Ojo Oloruntoba holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Lagos, Nigeria. He is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of African Studies, Carleton University, in Canada and an Honorary Professor at the Thabo Mbeki African School of Public and International Affairs, University of South Africa. He is the editor of The Palgrave Handbook of African Political Economy. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2023/07/25/the-african-continental-free-trade-area-can-transform-the-economy-of-africa/

The African Continental Free Trade Area can transform the economy of Africa Read More »

Shopping Cart