
Regional organisations and democratic (dis)consolidation in Africa
Regional Organisations And Democratic (Dis)ConsolidationI In Africa: Critical Reflections On The Role Of ECOWAS Abstract: This article seeks to explain the causes and processes of varied outcomes of democratic reforms in West Africa and the roles of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in deepening democracy in the subregion. I propose to explain why some countries have experienced democratic consolidation, and why there have been some reversals and retreats, and to examine the role of ECOWAS in democracy building and consolidation in the subregion. Many factors, such as the nature and the character of the states and their political elites, the historical forces that culminated in the return to democracy, the role of the civil society, the political economy of the states and the degree of freedom for political participation by the citizens affect the degree of democratic consolidation in West Africa. Given the recent retreat of democracy in Mali, Guinea, Burkina Faso and Niger, it would appear that the political elites in these countries lack political consensus and commitment to democratic culture. This article analyses the role of ECOWAS in promoting democracy in the subregion. In doing this, the objective is to identify the factors that are most influential in causing successes and failures of democratic consolidation in the subregion and the roles of the ECOWAS Commission in this process. The overarching questions are: what factors are most influential in causing successes and failures of democratic consolidation in West Africa and what factors determine the successes or failures of ECOWAS in this process? I found that ECOWAS has played some role in the consolidation of democracies in the subregion through involvement in solving political problems, election monitoring and building capacity of civil society groups. However, recent coups in the subregion have tested ECOWAS’s commitment to its protocol on democracy and good governance due to the weaknesses of its key institutions, the complexities of the coups and the weakened capacity of Nigeria as a regional hegemon. Introduction: This article seeks to explain the causes and processes of varied outcomes of democratic reforms in West Africa and the roles of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in deepening or undermining democracy in the subregion. Following the third wave of democracy (Huntington Citation1991; Diamond et al. Citation1997), during the 1990s many countries in West Africa transitioned from autocratic regimes into democratic regimes, at least in terms of formally instituting competitive multiparty electoral systems. I propose to explain why some countries have experienced democratic consolidation, and why there have been some reversals and retreats, as well as to examine the role of ECOWAS and its institutions in democracy building, consolidation or dis-consolidation in the subregion. The recent coups in several African countries such as Mali, Niger, Gabon, Guinea and Burkina Faso, as well as the exit from ECOWAS by three of these countries five decades into the existence of the regional organisation, present new dynamics that merit a multidimensional examination of the actorness of ECOWAS in not only promoting democracy but also ensuring that democracy fosters genuine participation and inclusive development (Obadare and Patel Citation2024). As a regional economic community, ECOWAS has instituted various institutional organs and processes, such as the ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, Council of the Wise, Directorate of Political Affairs, Peace and Security (PAPS) and the ECOWAS Parliament, among others, to achieve its stated goals of promoting economic integration, democratic governance, peace and security in the subregion (Van Vyk Citation2020; Aggad and Miyandazi Citationn.d.). The organs were established to promote the shared goals and values of democracy in line with the African Union’s Charter on Democracy, Election and Governance. How these institutions perform their roles has determined the extent to which they have deterred or undeterred unconstitutional change of government and deepen democracy in the subregion. This paper also analyses how the limited capacity of the key ECOWAS institutions such as the Assembly of Heads of State and government institutions to prevent the actions of key political actors in undermining democracy through change in constitution, manipulation of the electoral processes and the disconnect between citizens’ expectation of the gains of democracy and the reality are contributing to unconstitutional change of government and undermining democracy. I hypothesise that many factors, such as the nature and character of a state and its political elites, the historical forces that culminated in the return to democracy, the role of the civil society, the political economy of the member states of ECOWAS and the degree of freedom for political participation by the citizens affect the extent of democratic consolidation or dis-consolidation in West Africa. For example, Ake (Citation1996, 9) discusses the contradictions between the nature of the state and democratic aspirations in Africa thus: one of the most remarkable features of democratization in Africa is that it is totally indifferent to the character of the state. Democratic elections are being held to determine who will exercise the powers of the state with no questions asked about the character of the state as if it has no implications for democracy. But its implications are so serious that elections in Africa give the voter only a choice between oppressors. This is hardly surprising since Africa largely retains the colonial state structure, which is inherently anti-democratic, being the repressive apparatus of an occupying power. As it is increasingly turning out, democracy is failing due in part to the lack of the embeddedness of the state in the society, the disconnection between the political elites and the citizen, the vacuousness of the political parties and their programmes as well as the ways in which the political processes are organised in the various member states. The latitude and capacity of ECOWAS to mediate in the crisis of democracy that is engulfing the region is largely dependent on the nature of the state and the character of the elites. Where the state is populous and relatively well endowed, as in Nigeria and Ghana, the regional organisation is limited in the extent to which
Regional organisations and democratic (dis)consolidation in Africa Read More »








